Did military law change the definition of sexual harassment?
https://youtube.com/shorts/n_NefYK9_IM
Yes, it did. So in addition to there being regular old fashioned harassment as being defined in military and Army command policy, there also has been a substantive change to the UCMJ. So prior to this, Article 93 was where sexual harassment lived, and that’s the Article of the UCMJ, where it was charged.
Now sexual harassment has actually moved to being its own Article 134 offense. So yes, the law has changed. We have a lot of information about the technical differences and why we think those matter, and in some instances how we think that it actually improves the life of the client.
Jocelyn Stewart is a UCMJ court-martial attorney who specializes in defense of allegations of sexual assault for all branches of the military worldwide.
Contact the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart at 253-212-958
You Might Also Like These Articles
We are frequently asked whether the command can take action against a service member when Family Advocacy Program (FAP) unsubstantiates…
Read More
UNITED STATES v. SILVA Last year I submitted an appellate brief on behalf of Master Sergeant Michael Silva that resulted…
Read More
People generally put faith in the judicial system that the truth will bear out, the guilty are punished, and the…
Read More